Skip to main content

Annotations

Annotations are key-value pairs that can be attached to various entities for custom metadata and policy decisions. They support inheritance hierarchies that allow general definitions to be overridden by more specific ones.

Overview​

Annotations

Annotations provide flexible metadata that:

  • Can be attached to roles, groups, scopes, resource groups, resources, and principals
  • Are accessible during policy evaluation via the PORC
  • Support any valid JSON values
  • Follow inheritance hierarchies where more specific definitions take precedence

Parameterizing Policies​

Annotations enable a powerful pattern: generic policies that are parameterized by entity configuration.

Consider this policy that checks if a principal's environment matches the resource's environment:

package authz

default allow = false

allow {
input.principal.mannotations.environment == input.resource.annotations.environment
}

This policy is completely generic—it doesn't mention any specific environment. The role and resource group definitions parameterize it:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:finance-analyst"
name: finance-analyst
policy: "mrn:iam:policy:environment-match"
annotations:
- name: environment
value: finance # This role grants access to "finance" resources

resource-groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:resource-group:finance-data"
name: finance-data
policy: "mrn:iam:policy:resource-access"
annotations:
- name: environment
value: finance # Resources in this group are tagged "finance"

When a principal with the finance-analyst role accesses a resource in the finance-data group:

  • The role's environment: "finance" annotation flows into input.principal.mannotations
  • The resource group's environment: "finance" annotation flows into input.resource.annotations
  • The generic policy evaluates the match and grants access

This pattern is fundamental to the PolicyEngine architecture. Entities like Roles, Groups, Scopes, and Resource Groups serve a dual purpose:

  1. Policy selection: They link to a policy that contains the access control logic
  2. Policy parameterization: They provide annotations that flow into the PORC, giving the policy context-specific values to evaluate

This separation means you can:

  • Write generic, reusable policies that work across many contexts
  • Configure access through entity definitions without modifying policy code
  • Create new access patterns by defining new roles or resource groups with different annotations

Where Annotations Apply​

Annotations can be defined on multiple entity types:

EntityDefined InDescription
RolePolicyDomain spec.roles[].annotationsRole-specific metadata
GroupPolicyDomain spec.groups[].annotationsGroup-specific metadata
ScopePolicyDomain spec.scopes[].annotationsScope-specific metadata
Resource GroupPolicyDomain spec.resource-groups[].annotationsResource group metadata
ResourcePolicyDomain spec.resources[].annotations, or external resource resolution
Premium Only
Resource-specific metadata
PrincipalJWT claimsIdentity-level metadata

Annotation Inheritance​

Annotations follow inheritance hierarchies where conflicts are resolved by precedence rules. More specific or contextual definitions override more general ones.

Identity Annotation Hierarchy​

For identity-related annotations (available in input.principal.mannotations), the inheritance order from least to most dominant is:

Identity Inheritance

Example: If the same annotation key department is defined on both a Role and a Group that apply to a request, the Group's value takes precedence. If also defined in the principal's JWT claims, that value wins.

# Role definition
roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:developer"
annotations:
- name: department
value: engineering # Precedence 1
- name: access_level
value: standard

# Group definition
groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:platform-team"
annotations:
- name: department
value: platform # Precedence 2 - overrides role
- name: team
value: infrastructure

# Scope definition (if applicable)
scopes:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:scope:elevated"
annotations:
- name: access_level
value: elevated # Precedence 3 - overrides role

# Principal JWT claims
principal:
mannotations:
department: "security" # Precedence 4 - overrides all others

Resulting input.principal.mannotations:

{
"department": "security", // From principal (highest precedence)
"access_level": "elevated", // From scope
"team": "infrastructure" // From group (no conflict)
}

Resource Annotation Hierarchy​

For resource-related annotations (available in input.resource.annotations), the inheritance order from least to most dominant is:

Resource Inheritance

Example: If a resource belongs to a resource group, annotations from the resource group are inherited, but any annotations defined directly on the resource take precedence.

# Resource Group definition
resource-groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:resource-group:customer-data"
annotations:
- name: data_classification
value: confidential
- name: retention_days
value: 365
- name: requires_audit
value: true

# Resource with override
resource:
id: "mrn:data:customer:12345"
annotations:
- name: retention_days
value: 730 # Overrides resource group
- name: special_handling
value: true # Additional annotation

Resulting input.resource.annotations:

{
"data_classification": "confidential", // From resource group
"retention_days": "730", // From resource (overrides)
"requires_audit": "true", // From resource group
"special_handling": "true" // From resource (new)
}

Merge Strategies​

v1alpha4+ Feature

Merge strategies are available in PolicyDomain schema version v1alpha4 and later (including v1beta1).

When annotation keys conflict across inheritance levels, merge strategies determine how values are combined. The default strategy is deep, which recursively merges arrays and objects while letting higher-priority scalar values win. You can specify different strategies to control this behavior precisely.

Merge strategies are particularly useful for:

  • Accumulating permissions: Combining tags, capabilities, or allowed regions from multiple sources
  • Building configurations: Merging objects where each level adds or overrides specific fields
  • Set operations: Creating deduplicated lists from multiple sources

Available Strategies​

StrategyArraysObjectsScalars
replaceHigher replaces lowerHigher replaces lowerHigher wins
append[higher..., lower...]Shallow merge, higher winsHigher wins
prepend[lower..., higher...]Shallow merge, lower winsLower wins
deep[higher..., lower...]Recursive merge, higher winsHigher wins
unionDeduplicated set, higher firstSame as deepHigher wins

The default strategy is deep when no strategy is specified.

Specifying a Merge Strategy​

Add the merge field to an annotation to control how it combines with values from lower-priority sources:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:developer"
annotations:
- name: allowed_regions
value:
- us-west
merge: union # Deduplicate when combined with other sources

groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:global-team"
annotations:
- name: allowed_regions
value:
- us-east
- eu-west
merge: union # Combined result: ["us-east", "eu-west", "us-west"]

Strategy Precedence​

When merging annotations, the strategy is determined by priority:

  1. Higher-priority source's strategy (if specified)
  2. Lower-priority source's strategy (if higher has none)
  3. Default strategy (deep)

Merge Strategy Examples​

Accumulating Tags with Union​

Use union to collect unique values from all sources:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:developer"
annotations:
- name: tags
value:
- dev
- internal
merge: union

groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:platform-team"
annotations:
- name: tags
value:
- platform
- internal
merge: union

Result: ["platform", "internal", "dev"] (deduplicated, higher priority first)

Building Configuration Objects with Deep Merge​

Use deep to recursively merge nested objects:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:developer"
annotations:
- name: config
value:
timeouts:
read: 30
write: 60
retries: 3
merge: deep

groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:premium-users"
annotations:
- name: config
value:
timeouts:
write: 120
priority: high
merge: deep

Result:

{
"timeouts": {"read": 30, "write": 120},
"retries": 3,
"priority": "high"
}

Preserving Order with Append/Prepend​

Use append to add lower-priority elements after higher-priority ones:

resource-groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:resource-group:base"
annotations:
- name: processing_steps
value:
- validate
- log
merge: append

resources:
- selector: ["mrn:data:sensitive:.*"]
group: "mrn:iam:resource-group:base"
annotations:
- name: processing_steps
value:
- encrypt
- audit
merge: append

Result: ["encrypt", "audit", "validate", "log"] (higher priority first)

Use prepend to add lower-priority elements before higher-priority ones:

# Same as above but with prepend
annotations:
- name: processing_steps
value:
- encrypt
- audit
merge: prepend

Result: ["validate", "log", "encrypt", "audit"] (lower priority first)

Replacing Values Explicitly​

Use replace when you want to completely override a lower-priority value:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:standard-user"
annotations:
- name: permissions
value:
- read
- list

groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:admin"
annotations:
- name: permissions
value:
- read
- write
- delete
- admin
merge: replace # Completely replaces role permissions

Result: ["read", "write", "delete", "admin"] (role permissions ignored)

Type Mismatch Behavior​

When conflicting values have incompatible types (e.g., array vs. string), the higher-priority value always wins regardless of the merge strategy:

roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:basic"
annotations:
- name: access
value:
- read # Array

groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:special"
annotations:
- name: access
value: full # String (incompatible type)
merge: union # Strategy is ignored for type mismatch

Result: "full" (higher priority wins due to type mismatch)

Inheritance Use Cases​

Establishing Defaults with Overrides​

Define baseline annotations at a general level and override for specific cases:

# All developers get standard access
roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:developer"
annotations:
- name: max_data_size
value: 1GB
- name: can_export
value: false

# Platform team members can export
groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:platform-team"
annotations:
- name: can_export
value: true # Override for this group

Layered Security Classifications​

Apply cumulative security requirements:

resource-groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:resource-group:pii"
annotations:
- name: classification
value: PII
- name: encryption_required
value: true

# Specific high-value resource
resource:
annotations:
- name: classification
value: PII-HIGH # More specific classification
- name: two_person_rule
value: true # Additional requirement

Annotation Structure​

Annotations are defined as a list of objects with the following fields:

FieldRequiredDescription
nameYesThe annotation key (string)
valueYesThe annotation value (native YAML in v1beta1, JSON-encoded string in v1alpha3/4)
mergeNoMerge strategy: replace, append, prepend, deep, or union

In v1beta1, annotation values are written as native YAML—no JSON encoding required:

annotations:
- name: department
value: engineering # String
- name: cost_center
value: 12345 # Number
- name: tags
value: # Array
- production
- critical
- name: metadata
value: # Object
created_by: admin
version: 2
- name: enabled
value: true # Boolean

This is cleaner to read and write than the legacy JSON-encoded format.

Legacy Format (v1alpha3/v1alpha4)​

In older schema versions, values must be JSON-encoded strings:

JSON Encoding Required in v1alpha3/v1alpha4

String values require nested quotes. The outer quotes are YAML string delimiters; the inner escaped quotes are the JSON string value.

Typev1alpha4 (JSON-encoded)v1beta1 (Native)
String"\"engineering\""engineering
Number"12345"12345
Boolean"true"true
Array'["read", "write"]'- read
- write
Object'{"region": "us-west"}'region: us-west
# v1alpha4 - JSON-encoded (required)
annotations:
- name: "department"
value: "\"engineering\"" # Parsed as JSON string: "engineering"

# v1beta1 - Native YAML (recommended)
annotations:
- name: department
value: engineering # Much cleaner!

After parsing, annotations are available in policies as native values regardless of schema version:

{
"department": "engineering",
"cost_center": 12345,
"tags": ["production", "critical"],
"metadata": {
"created_by": "admin",
"version": 2
},
"enabled": true
}

Using Annotations in Policies​

Simple Value Checks​

package authz

default allow = false

# Check department
allow {
input.principal.mannotations.department == "engineering"
}

# Check resource tag
allow {
input.resource.annotations.environment == "production"
}

Array Annotations​

package authz

default allow = false

# Principal must have required capability
allow {
"admin" in input.principal.mannotations.capabilities
}

# Resource must have a matching tag
allow {
some tag in input.resource.annotations.tags
tag in input.principal.mannotations.allowed_tags
}

Nested Annotations​

package authz

default allow = false

# Check nested value
allow {
input.resource.annotations.metadata.level >= 2
}

Matching Annotations​

package authz

default allow = false

# Principal and resource department must match
allow {
input.principal.mannotations.department == input.resource.annotations.department
}

# Principal must have access to the resource's region
allow {
input.resource.annotations.region in input.principal.mannotations.allowed_regions
}

Defining Annotations in PolicyDomain​

On Roles​

spec:
roles:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:role:regional-admin"
name: regional-admin
annotations:
- name: region
value: us-west
- name: permissions
value:
- read
- write
- admin
policy: "mrn:iam:policy:regional-access"

On Groups​

spec:
groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:group:finance"
name: finance
annotations:
- name: department
value: finance
- name: cost_center
value: 12345
roles:
- "mrn:iam:role:finance-user"

On Resource Groups​

spec:
resource-groups:
- mrn: "mrn:iam:resource-group:pii-data"
name: pii-data
annotations:
- name: data_classification
value: PII
- name: retention_days
value: 365
- name: requires_audit
value: true
policy: "mrn:iam:policy:pii-access"

Common Annotation Patterns​

Department/Team Access​

package authz

default allow = false

# Same department access
allow {
input.principal.mannotations.department == input.resource.annotations.department
}

Geographic Restrictions​

package authz

default allow = false

# Principal's region must include the resource's region
allow {
input.resource.annotations.region in input.principal.mannotations.allowed_regions
}

Time-Based Annotations​

package authz

default allow = false

# Check if access hasn't expired
allow {
expires := time.parse_rfc3339_ns(input.resource.annotations.access_expires)
expires > time.now_ns()
}

Feature Flags​

package authz

default allow = false

# Check feature flag
allow {
input.principal.mannotations.beta_features == true
startswith(input.operation, "beta:")
}

Best Practices​

  1. Use consistent keys: Establish naming conventions across all entity types
  2. Keep values simple: Prefer primitives over complex objects
  3. Don't store sensitive data: Annotations are not encrypted
  4. Document annotations: Maintain a reference of used annotations and their expected sources
  5. Validate at ingestion: Ensure annotation values are valid before storage
  6. Design for inheritance: Place default values at lower precedence levels (roles, resource groups) and overrides at higher levels
  7. Be explicit about precedence: When the same key appears at multiple levels, document the intended override behavior
  8. Avoid deep nesting: While nested objects are supported, flatter structures are easier to reason about in policies
  9. Choose merge strategies intentionally: Use union for accumulating unique values, deep for configuration objects, and replace when you need complete override behavior
  10. Be consistent with strategies: If an annotation key uses a specific merge strategy, use the same strategy at all inheritance levels to avoid confusion
  • Roles: Can define annotations inherited by principals
  • Groups: Can define annotations that override role annotations
  • Scopes: Can define annotations that override group annotations
  • Resources: Can have annotations that override resource group defaults